Baghdadi’s Death Should Have Been a Clear Victory for Trump. It Wasn’t.


Published on October 28, 2019

The Washington Post

The assassination of Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Bagdhadi this weekend should have been a clear victory for President Trump. Instead, his stumbling and graphic announcement of Baghdadi’s death shows why he remains a polarizing figure for so many Americans.

Americans will not mourn the terrorist mastermind’s death. The Islamic State unleashed mass murder in the Middle East and killed many Americans. It inspired or directed others to launch terrorist operations in Western countries, most notably the November 2015 attacks in Paris that left more than 130 people dead. No rational person will miss Bagdhadi or his twisted, evil organization.

Nor will many Americans regret our military’s role in ending the Islamic State’s rule or its leader’s life. The effort to defeat the terrorist group started under President Barack Obama and has received the support of virtually all political leaders. One may differ over specific tactics employed in the battle, but there was no dispute between our increasingly polarized parties that we should utterly destroy the Islamic State.

Click here to read the rest of this piece at the Washington Post’s website.

Henry Olsen is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.


Most Read

EPPC BRIEFLY
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

SEARCH

Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today