VIDEO: Mary Hasson on Trans Movement and Family Structure


September 28, 2021 | enter for Urban Renewal and Education – 2021 National Policy Summit


In September 2021, EPPC Kate O’Beirne Fellow Mary Rice Hasson spoke at the Center for Urban Renewal and Education’s 2021 National Policy Summit, in a session titled “Family Structure, Values and Foundation.”

Click here to learn more or click below to watch her remarks:


Most Read

EPPC BRIEFLY
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

SEARCH

Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

More in Person and Identity Project

Related Publications

EPPC Files Amicus Briefs in Supreme Court Supporting States’ Right to Limit Insurance Coverage for…

Eric Kniffin

On August 28 and 29, 2024, EPPC scholars Eric Kniffin and Mary Hasson filed amicus briefs in Crouch v. Anderson and Folwell v….

Articles

 

EPPC Amicus Brief Asks Court to Revisit Catholic Hospital’s Refusal to Provide “Gender Transition” Coverage 

Eric Kniffin

On Monday, June 10, 2024, the Ethics and Public Policy Center filed an amicus brief in the Eleventh Circuit Court…

Articles

 

Gender Identity Policy Under the Biden Administration

Rachel N. Morrison

With the Equality Act facing difficult odds in the Senate, the Biden administration has imposed its gender identity policies through its regulatory and enforcement powers. These policies largely ignore competing interests or rights of women, children, and religious organizations and persons.

Articles

EPPC Scholars Meet with Federal Officials to Discuss Concerns over Proposed Transgender Treatment Mandate for Veterans

Mary Rice Hasson

EPPC Kate O’Beirne Senior Fellow Mary Rice Hasson and Fellow Rachel N. Morrison met with federal government officials to discuss concerns over a proposal by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) to remove the current exclusion for “gender alterations” from its medical benefits package. The scholars objected to the VA’s characterization that such care is “medically necessary” and that it is “consistent with medical industry standards.”

Articles