EPPC Scholars Meet with Federal Officials to Discuss Concerns in Expansive EEOC Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Regulations 


Published February 1, 2024

PDF

On Thursday, February 1, 2024, EPPC scholars Rachel N. Morrison and Natalie Dodson met with federal government officials to oppose the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s proposed Pregnant Workers Fairness Act regulations, which are expected to be finalized soon. 

As the scholar explained, “The PWFA fills a longstanding gap in employment law and provides important accommodation protections for women in the workplace experiencing pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions.” However, EEOC’s proposed regulations, which would mandate accommodations for abortion, are expansive, contrary to law and contrary to congressional intent. The scholars raised many concerns with EEOC’s proposal, including whether it could preempt state pro-life laws. The scholars urged the government to “ensure that the statutory and regulatory process is upheld, and that EEOC’s PWFA regulations have sufficient legal justification.” 

A written version of their comments, submitted to the government, is available here (PDF).  


Rachel N. Morrison is a Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, where she directs EPPC’s HHS Accountability Project. An attorney, her legal and policy work focuses on religious liberty, health care rights of conscience, the right to life, nondiscrimination, and civil rights.

Most Read

EPPC BRIEFLY
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

SEARCH

Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today