Bioethics and American Democracy publication

The government’s relationship with social media is not analogous to government interactions with print media.

Doctors don’t necessarily need less work to assuage burnout; they need to do more of the vocational work that gives their profession meaning.

Rights articulated in law are necessary even when the sovereign is a man of good will.

Elites and institutions originated our polarized political climate, and the dynamic is not likely to change anytime soon.

The government can say whatever it wants publicly; it just cannot stop other Americans from saying something else.

This struggle over federal censorship reflects two competing visions of freedom in America.

Curbing censorship will require a full-scale assault on the surveillance state.

Recent ‘analysis’ frames Missouri v. Biden in entirely partisan terms, revealing an inadequate understanding of First Amendment guarantees.

On Independence Day (fittingly), the court granted our petition in Missouri v. Biden for a temporary injunction against the government censors.

Blueprints for flourishing in the midst of a decaying civilization.

While much of the press cooperated with the state’s censorship efforts and has ignored our court battle, we expect that it will ultimately go to the Supreme Court, setting up Missouri v. Biden to be the most important free speech case of our generation—and arguably, of the past 50 years.

Caught between the oaths they took as medical students and the demands of corporate healthcare, today’s doctors suffer moral injury.