Thoughts on a Post-Roe Agenda


Published on November 18, 2021

National Review - November 29, 2021 issue

Read other pieces by EPPC scholars published in National Review’s “Against Roe” issue:

Erika Bachiochi | Alexandra DeSanctis | O. Carter Snead


We’re approaching 49 years of neither wearying nor resting in the fight to protect unborn children under the law, and a major victory has rarely felt so close.

A Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that recognizes the shallowness of the Roe v. Wade decision and the empty-headedness of Planned Parenthood v. Casey is far from assured. But should it happen, a favorable ruling in Dobbs would be an unprecedented victory for the millions who have marched in January snow and held innumerable prayer rallies for an end to legalized abortion.

Of course, it would also send the Left into paroxysms of fury, with calls for boycotts, secession, or worse. And unfortunately for social conservatives, recent history suggests that elected leaders who share their views are ill equipped to brave such a storm. The wall of shame is crowded with names of Republican governors who have backed down on socially conservative legislation when faced with a media firestorm, activist boycotts, or corporate pressure.

A post-Dobbs world may lead to similar capitulations. Untold numbers of nominally pro-life politicians have been able to get elected without thinking they’d end up playing with live ammunition. How many Republican governors are ready for Fortune 500 companies to move out of their states? For major airlines to threaten to stop serving midsize airports in red states? For the NBA or WNBA to celebrate Planned Parenthood with uniform patches and percentages of gate revenue?

The pressure campaigns on religious freedom and voting bills would look like child’s play if a state moved to enact restrictions potentially enabled by Dobbs. Social conservatives need to prepare a counteroffensive. A meaningful legislative agenda, coupled with a strategic PR campaign, could help steady the movement in the first heady and unstable months following, God willing, a favorable decision in the Dobbs case.

Click here to read the rest of this piece at National Review‘s website.

Patrick T. Brown is a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, where his work focuses on developing a robust pro-family economic agenda and supporting families as the cornerstone of a healthy and flourishing society.


Most Read

EPPC BRIEFLY
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

Upcoming Event |

The Problem of Atheism: Del Noce, Marx, and the Roots of Western Irreligion

SEARCH

Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

Related Publications

If The Supreme Court Whiffs On Abortion, They’ll Blow Up The Conservative Legal Movement

Nathanael Blake

The Dobbs case challenging Roe v. Wade could bring grassroots conservatives back into the originalist fold, or it could ignite…

Articles

The Federalist / December 8, 2021

I Couldn’t Vote for Trump, but I’m Grateful for His Supreme Court Picks

Erika Bachiochi

If Roe goes, the pro-life movement can begin where it left off in 1973, working to convince fellow citizens (especially in blue states like mine) that we owe dependent and vulnerable unborn children what every human being is due: hospitality, respect and care.

Articles

The New York Times / December 7, 2021

Overturning Roe Would Be the Easy Part for the Pro-Life Movement

Henry Olsen

Overturning Roe will not suddenly make abortion illegal throughout the country. Instead, it will simply return the abortion question to the political process. That means public opinion, which Roe has peremptorily suppressed for almost 50 years, will rule the roost. And it is decidedly mixed.

Articles

The Washington Post / December 1, 2021

Pro-Abortion Attorney Fudges Facts on International Abortion

Alexandra DeSanctis

Nearly every European country that allows abortion at all limits it to the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, and a handful allow it until 15 weeks. They do not, as one of the attorneys arguing against Mississippi’s ban on abortion after 15 weeks suggested, allow abortion after that point for “broad social reasons.”

Articles

National Review Online / December 1, 2021