Roe in the Public Mind

Published on November 18, 2021

National Review - November 29, 2021 issue

Read other pieces by EPPC scholars published in National Review’s “Against Roe” issue:

Erika Bachiochi | Patrick T. Brown | O. Carter Snead

In the upcoming Supreme Court case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Court very well might uphold Missi­s­sippi’s prohibition on most abortions after 15 weeks’ gestation, and most observers expect it to do so. In that case, the decision will strike at the heart of the Court’s two previous landmark abortion cases: Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

In response, proponents of legal abortion will use every strategy at their disposal to discredit the ruling. One essential element of such a strategy will be a PR campaign condemning the reversal of Roe and Casey as contrary to American public opinion, and an effort to channel voter anger about the ruling against Republican candidates in next fall’s midterm elections.

But the pro-life movement should not let abortion-rights supporters get away with it. Judging from public-opinion polling over the most recent decade, though American sentiment is fairly complex when it comes to whether and when abortion should be legal, a clear majority opposes the status quo in abortion law and policy.

Click here to read the rest of this piece at National Review‘s website.

Alexandra DeSanctis is a staff writer for National Review and a visiting fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Most Read

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

Upcoming Event |

The Problem of Atheism: Del Noce, Marx, and the Roots of Western Irreligion


Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

Related Publications

If The Supreme Court Whiffs On Abortion, They’ll Blow Up The Conservative Legal Movement

Nathanael Blake

The Dobbs case challenging Roe v. Wade could bring grassroots conservatives back into the originalist fold, or it could ignite…


The Federalist / December 8, 2021

I Couldn’t Vote for Trump, but I’m Grateful for His Supreme Court Picks

Erika Bachiochi

If Roe goes, the pro-life movement can begin where it left off in 1973, working to convince fellow citizens (especially in blue states like mine) that we owe dependent and vulnerable unborn children what every human being is due: hospitality, respect and care.


The New York Times / December 7, 2021

Overturning Roe Would Be the Easy Part for the Pro-Life Movement

Henry Olsen

Overturning Roe will not suddenly make abortion illegal throughout the country. Instead, it will simply return the abortion question to the political process. That means public opinion, which Roe has peremptorily suppressed for almost 50 years, will rule the roost. And it is decidedly mixed.


The Washington Post / December 1, 2021

Pro-Abortion Attorney Fudges Facts on International Abortion

Alexandra DeSanctis

Nearly every European country that allows abortion at all limits it to the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, and a handful allow it until 15 weeks. They do not, as one of the attorneys arguing against Mississippi’s ban on abortion after 15 weeks suggested, allow abortion after that point for “broad social reasons.”


National Review Online / December 1, 2021