Broad Coalition Submits Objections to HHS Proposal to Funnel Millions of Taxpayer Dollars to Abortion Providers

May 17, 2021

[Click here to watch video of today’s press conference.]

WASHINGTON—A coalition of more than twenty organizations—including leading think tanks, religious institutions, and public interest medical, legal, and advocacy groups—are submitting comments to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) objecting to HHS’s proposed rule that would funnel millions of taxpayer dollars to abortion providers by undoing a Trump-era regulation that ensured separation between Title X funded programs and abortion activities. Today marks the end of the 30-day public comment period for the proposed rule.

Title X is the only federal program devoted solely to the provision of family planning and related preventive services, with priority given to low-income persons. In creating Title X, Congress explicitly prohibited funds from being used “in programs where abortion is a method of family planning.” Consistent with this law, HHS finalized a Title X regulation in 2019 that required organizations operating Title X funded programs to have strict physical and financial separation from any abortion activities. Rather than serving Title X clients consistent with the 2019 regulation, Planned Parenthood and some other abortion providers chose to prioritize abortion and consequently dropped out of the Title X program.

The proposed rule under the Biden administration would:

  • Eliminate physical and financial separation requirements between Title X activities and abortion activities;
  • Mandate abortion counseling and referrals in violation of federal conscience protections, such as the Weldon Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act;
  • No longer encourage family and parental participation, despite statutory requirements; and,
  • Weaken reporting and compliance requirements, including for subrecipients and provisions related to abuse of minors.

Today, the Ethics & Public Policy Center is hosting a press conference with former Trump HHS officials and with the Alliance Defending Freedom to discuss the comments submitted by coalition members in opposition to the rule.

“Most Americans reject the idea of abortion being used for birth control, which is why they don’t want to fund abortion providers through the Title X program,” said Roger Severino, Senior Fellow at the Ethics & Public Policy Center, where he directs the HHS Accountability Project. “President Biden wants to change the rules to bail out his friends in the abortion industry who care more about abortion than actual family planning,” Severino added.  “People are pushing back against an extreme President and HHS Secretary who want to not only force people to refer for abortion but have taxpayers fund such taking of life,” concluded Severino.

Organizations that are submitting public comments in opposition to the proposed rule (comments linked where available) include:

# # #

Most Read

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.


Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

Related Publications

EPPC Scholars Submit Public Comment Opposing HHS Section 1557 Proposed Transgender Mandate in Healthcare

Rachel N. Morrison

It will be the height of arbitrariness and capriciousness to finalize such a dangerous rule in the face of these and the many other grave harms identified in this comment when they are not only not mandated by Congress, but go against the very statute the Proposed Rule purports to enforce.


/ October 3, 2022

Biden’s FDA Supports Vaccinating America’s Infants While his CDC Selectively Ignores Risks From Illegal Immigrants

David Gortler

While the FDA pushes vaccines on all age groups—claiming that a dire COVID-19 public health emergency still exists—the White House appears perfectly comfortable with the CDC’s April 1 decision to terminate a public health authority meant to prevent the spread of COVID-19 across our borders.


Newsweek / July 15, 2022

A Couple’s Long Journey in the Pro-Life Movement

Roger Severino

As the fall of Roe v. Wade rocked the country, Carrie and Roger Severino celebrated the realization of decades of…


The New York Times / June 28, 2022

Evidence Shows Healthy Children Don’t Need COVID-19 Vaccines

David Gortler

There is no need for a primary series of COVID-19 vaccines for children. The young have a decreased benefit from COVID-19 vaccination but are also at a greater safety risk. Plus, many children have already had COVID and have the benefits of naturally acquired immunity.


Charlemagne Institute / June 15, 2022