Berlin and the Contradictions of Identity Politics


Published July 30, 2026

First Things

On July 25, twenty-one-year-old Abdul Ballout drove a van into a crowd at Berlin’s Pride festival before stabbing attendees with a machete. One woman was killed and twenty-nine people were injured. German authorities described the incident as a suspected Islamist terrorist attack; Ballout was shot dead in a confrontation with police the following day. 

The response to the attack is the latest example of how identity politics is beginning to break down under its own contradictions. For instead of anger, there were anxious appeals not to let the attack “divide us,” as though divisiveness lay in the public’s reaction rather than in the murderer’s motives. Identity politics only condemns violence when the attacker belongs to a “privileged” group and the victim belongs to a “protected” one. When those roles flip, as they did in Berlin, the outrage goes quiet. This double standard is now so obvious that it is destroying the public’s ability to have honest, serious debate about real problems. 

Back at the very start of my academic career, in the early 1990s, a colleague once remarked that “method is the net designed to catch the fish it is designed to catch.” It was, of course, the heyday of postmodernism, and such mantic utterances were a staple of those seeking membership of the academic club. Yet there is a kernel of truth there, especially when applied to identity politics, the practical fruit of postmodernism in public life. Identity politics is a net designed to catch the villains it is designed to catch. More than that, it is also designed to delegitimize discussion of their villainy in any terms other than those the identity politicians choose to allow. 

Click here to continue reading.


Carl R. Trueman is a fellow in EPPC’s Evangelicals in Civic Life Program. His work focuses on helping civic leaders and policymakers better understand the deep philosophical and cultural roots of our current social malaise. In addition to his scholarship on the intellectual foundations of expressive individualism and the sexual revolution, Trueman is also interested in the origins, rise, and use of critical theory by progressives and the current crisis in anthropology. He serves as a professor at Grove City College.  

Most Read

EPPC BRIEFLY
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

SEARCH

Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

More in Evangelicals in Civic Life