Published February 23, 2026
The Political Science Reviewer
As part of its new issue on Christianity and Politics, the academic journal Political Science Reviewer has just published my article, “To Redeem Reason: Appreciating the Religiously Inspired Intervention of Mary Wollstonecraft.”
In the article, I foreground Wollstonecraft’s rejection of voluntarist conceptions of divine, political, and patriarchal authority. In my view, these errors serve, in some large measure, to define the modern period and continue to wreak havoc in our day, traveling downstream from theology to politics to domestic relations. As a Catholic legal scholar with a strong commitment to the Catholic natural law tradition, I see in Wollstonecraft’s natural theology a helpful corrective for our time.
The article can be accessed online here and I’ve included the article abstract here:
This essay reclaims Mary Wollstonecraft as a deeply religious thinker whose defense of women’s rational capacity corrects modernity’s flawed, disembodied notion of reason and its damaging effects on views of women. Echoing Pope Benedict XVI’s critique of such rationality, I argue that the “masculine” reason often criticized by modern feminists is actually an erroneous conception of reason itself—one Wollstonecraft challenged more fundamentally than later feminists. Contrary to the once common portrayal of Wollstonecraft as a secular Enlightenment radical, and building on my 2021 book The Rights of Women, I show she was a religiously inspired moral thinker. Her ideas rest on the biblical truth that women and men are equally rational beings made in God’s image, destined for eternal communion with Him. I trace depictions of women’s rationality from Christine de Pizan’s early fifteenth-century pre-Reformation defense through the errors of Catholic nominalism, Reformation voluntarism, and Enlightenment abstraction. Wollstonecraft used available intellectual resources to reject voluntarist views of divine, political, and patriarchal authority. Instead, she reclaimed a richer, authoritative reason grounded in theological anthropology, emphasizing moral formation and personal virtue. Her vision for women prioritizes virtuous self-governance, guided by good parents, teachers, and books. This integrates—albeit imperfectly—women’s rational capacities with their embodied duties, especially motherhood. Though theologically distinct from Benedict’s Catholic synthesis of faith and reason, body and soul, Wollstonecraft’s virtue-centered framework corrects modern feminism’s liberal-autonomy models. It affirms women’s full humanity and rationality, honors embodied sexual difference, and elevates the private and public value of caregiving.
Although I’ll be on Substack less regularly during the penitential season of Lent, I’m happy to discuss these questions in the comments (but only if you’re willing to read the article in its entirety 😉
The PSR issue on the whole looks really excellent — happy reading!
Fellow Erika Bachiochi is a legal scholar who works at the intersection of constitutional law, political theory, women’s history, and Catholic social teaching. She is a Professor of Practice at the School for Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership at Arizona State University, where she teaches courses in the history of political thought, directs the Mercy Otis Warren Initiative for Women in Civic Life and Thought, and serves as founding editor-in-chief of its online journal, Fairer Disputations.
