<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Ethics &amp; Public Policy Center</provider_name><provider_url>https://eppc.org</provider_url><author_name>Erika Bachiochi</author_name><author_url>https://eppc.org/author/erika_bachiochi/</author_url><title>A Putative Right in Search of a Constitutional Justification: Understanding Planned Parenthood v. Casey&#x2019;s Equality Rationale and How It Undermines Women&#x2019;s Equality - Ethics &amp; Public Policy Center</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;a href="https://eppc.org/publication/a-putative-right-in-search-of-a-constitutional-justification-understanding-planned-parenthood-v-caseys-equality-rationale-and-how-it-undermines-womens-equality/"&gt;A Putative Right in Search of a Constitutional Justification: Understanding &lt;em&gt;Planned Parenthood v. Casey&lt;/em&gt;&#x2019;s Equality Rationale and How It Undermines Women&#x2019;s Equality&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
&lt;!--//--&gt;&lt;![CDATA[//&gt;&lt;!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(c,d){"use strict";var e=!1,n=!1;if(d.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},!c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var r,a,i,s=d.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),n=d.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=0;o&lt;n.length;o++)n[o].style.display="none";for(o=0;o&lt;s.length;o++)if(r=s[o],e.source===r.contentWindow){if(r.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;r.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(a=d.createElement("a"),i=d.createElement("a"),a.href=r.getAttribute("src"),i.href=t.value,i.host===a.host)if(d.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener("message",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),d.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),c.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!n){n=!0;for(var e,t,r=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),i=d.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),s=0;s&lt;i.length;s++){if(!(e=i[s]).getAttribute("data-secret"))t=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t);if(r||a)(t=e.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),e.parentNode.replaceChild(t,e)}}}}(window,document);
//--&gt;&lt;!]]&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://eppc.org/publication/a-putative-right-in-search-of-a-constitutional-justification-understanding-planned-parenthood-v-caseys-equality-rationale-and-how-it-undermines-womens-equality/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;A Putative Right in Search of a Constitutional Justification: Understanding &lt;em&gt;Planned Parenthood v. Casey&lt;/em&gt;&#x2019;s Equality Rationale and How It Undermines Women&#x2019;s Equality&#x201D; &#x2014; Ethics &amp; Public Policy Center" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><thumbnail_url>https://eppc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/shutterstock_141934102-2.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1600</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>1172</thumbnail_height><description>The justices&#x2019; concerns about women&#x2019;s equality are the key interpretative lens through which to understand the controversial reaffirmance of Roe v. Wade, but one which has been inadequately explored and critiqued on the part of those critical of Planned Parenthood v. Casey.</description></oembed>
