The West Needs to Think Through Its Endgame in Ukraine

Published March 7, 2022

The Washington Post

The United States and Europe are rightly backing Ukraine in its courageous defense against Russia’s invasion. But as the facts on the ground shift by the day, the West needs to think hard about its endgame: Is it Russian defeat or victory for Ukraine?

Because there’s a difference between the two.

Russia invaded Ukraine to compel it to become a Russian satellite, perhaps even to annex it forcibly. Russian President Vladimir Putin has been clear about these aims from the outset, so Russian victory would involve removing the duly elected Ukrainian government and ensuring that a new puppet leadership would not just disavow any interest in joining the European Union or NATO but decisively reorient toward the east. These core goals appeared again in Putin’s newly announced “peace” proposals. A Russian victory means the end to Ukrainian freedom.

Click here to read the rest of this piece at the Washington Post‘s website.

Henry Olsen is a Washington Post columnist and a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, studies and provides commentary on American politics. His work focuses on how America’s political order is being upended by populist challenges, from the left and the right. He also studies populism’s impact in other democracies in the developed world.

Most Read

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

Upcoming Event |

The Promise and Peril of Civic Renewal: Richard John Neuhaus, Peter L. Berger, and “To Empower People”


Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today