The Democratic Rift Between Progressives and Moderates Is Unresolvable

Published on August 24, 2021

The Washington Post

Much of Washington’s chattering class is fixated on the ongoing battle between Democratic moderates and progressives over the fate of President Biden’s domestic agenda. They wonder how these disagreements will get resolved. They have yet to realize that this battle is essentially unresolvable.

Journalists typically frame these differences as ones over legislative process and details. Progressives want more spending; moderates want less. Progressives want Democrats to act alone; moderates want bipartisanship. Progressives want bold action on climate change; moderates want to go slower. And so on and so on.

This framing suggests that differences can be resolved by old-fashioned Washington dealmaking. Progressives accept less than they want, moderates give more than they want and the problem goes away with everyone satisfied if not happy. That’s how Beltway elites have settled squabbles since the Founding, and it usually works.

The problem now is that this view fundamentally misdiagnoses the nature of the Democratic dispute. Progressives and moderates disagree on very little at the level of principle. Virtually every Democratic officeholder calls climate change a crisis, and all endorse the goals of Biden’s domestic spending plans. This has been the case for decades, at least since 1992, when pro-life Pennsylvania Democratic governor Robert P. Casey Sr. was denied a speaking slot at the party’s convention. The battle between liberal McGovernites and conservative union and city boss leaders ended long ago with the McGovernites firmly in control.

Click here to read the rest of this piece at the Washington Post’s website.

Most Read

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

Upcoming Event |

The Transgender Revolution in the Classroom: What Parents Need to Know


Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

Related Publications

The World’s Populists Are Ascendant

Henry Olsen

Norway’s election on Monday begins a two-month collection of votes around the globe that will tell us a lot about public opinion a year-and-a-half into the pandemic. Though each country is different, the patterns are already clear: The traditional right is down, while the far left and populism are on the rise.


The Washington Post / September 15, 2021

The Virginia Governor’s Race Might Not Be a Slam Dunk for Democrat Terry McAuliffe

Henry Olsen

Virginia has become a Democratic-leaning state over the past decade, which gives former governor Terry McAuliffe a leg up in his effort to get his old job back. The polls, however, suggest that it might not be a slam dunk.


The Washington Post / September 7, 2021

Manchin Sees Clearly What His Party’s Progressives Don’t or Won’t

Henry Olsen

Sen. Joe Manchin’s declaration that he wants his fellow Democrats to take a “strategic pause” in crafting the party’s proposed $3.5 trillion domestic spending package is an early warning sign for the political troubles Democrats are courting if they ignore his plea and move full speed ahead.


The Washington Post / September 3, 2021

The Supreme Court Had No Reason to Block Texas’s Abortion Law

Henry Olsen

The Supreme Court’s refusal to prevent operation of Texas’s law banning abortion after a fetal heartbeat can be detected has unleashed a squall of public debate over abortion law. While that furor won’t calm for months or more, one thing is clear: The court’s majority was legally correct.


The Washington Post / September 2, 2021