Published May 1, 2004
How does technological progress affect the way judges interpret the law? This question is especially significant for those who believe the Constitution should be construed according to its original meaning. O. Carter Snead examines three different crises that technology creates for judicial interpretation—crises of application, crises of premises, and crises of meaning.
(Click here to read the entire article from the Spring 2004 issue of The New Atlantis.)
Most Read
Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.
Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.
Donate todayGeorge Weigel
The Catholic Church today is a field hospital and some of the triage doctors, rather than curing the wounded, are insisting that the hospital no longer tell people that landmines will kill you.
Articles
Syndicated Column / March 1, 2023
David Gortler
Like many other things the Biden White House implements, they force through a multitude of ideas, concepts and public health mandates which “seem” like they could work, but without the requisite conclusive scientifically obtained evidence that they will work.
Articles
Brownstone Institute / February 27, 2023
