Supreme Court Rules Against Trump on Venezuelan Deportations


Published May 16, 2025

National Review Online

By a vote of 7 to 2, the Supreme Court today ruled that two detainees who were deemed to be members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA) were entitled to injunctive relief against being summarily deported pursuant to President Trump’s Alien Enemies Act declaration. The same relief was extended to members of a putative class of similarly situated detainees in the Northern District of Texas. I’m going to lay out here what the Court ruled (and what it didn’t) and present a quick summary of the divide between the per curiam majority and the two dissenters, Justice Alito and Justice Thomas. (The ruling bears the somewhat confusing caption A.A.R.P. v. Trump. A.A.R.P. is of one of the plaintiffs, not the organization formerly known as the American Association of Retired Persons.)

Click here to continue reading.


Edward Whelan is a Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and holds EPPC’s Antonin Scalia Chair in Constitutional Studies. He is the longest-serving President in EPPC’s history, having held that position from March 2004 through January 2021.

Most Read

EPPC BRIEFLY
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

SEARCH

Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

More in The Constitution, the Courts, and the Culture