Social Security Endgame

Published September 1, 2005

American Political Science Association Roundtable on Social Security and the Future of Self-Government

Even those who (like me) voted for President Bush must concede that “erupting in political flames” aptly describes the Social Security initiative. The reason is that it proposed to violate the most basic rules of fiscal justice and economic efficiency. Yet if President Bush squandered “political capital,” the Democrats didn’t gain any, because their approach violates the same principles. A workable compromise is fairly easy, and Chicken Littles should recall that both Reagan’s reforms were pronounced dead several times before they happened. The main danger is that the two parties “decide not to decide”: to find an “exit strategy,” and “walk away from the table,” as Fred Barnes and E.J. Dionne began urging their parties months ago. Not to decide about Social Security is to decide — to follow Europe and Japan in committing national suicide.

Click here to read this entire presentation:

 Social Security Endgame: How the U.S. Can Avoid Europe’s Demographic ‘Black Hole (text and slides)

 Social Security Endgame: How the U.S. Can Avoid Europe’s Demographic ‘Black Hole’ (slides)

Most Read

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.


Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

More in Economics and Ethics