Indexing in the Affordable Care Act: The Impact on the Federal Budget


Published October 27, 2015

Mercatus Center - George Mason University

To view an article authored by Mr. Capretta and Mr. Antos based on the analysis presented in their Mercatus Center paper, click here.

ABSTRACT

Proponents of the Affordable Care Act have pointed to the Congressional Budget Office’s cost estimates to support their argument that the law will result in lower federal budget deficits in the future. Much less is said about the reasons for this forecast. This paper explains that the primary reason for the projected deficit reduction is the law’s heavy reliance on indexing important provisions in order to restrain spending and increase revenue. The key provisions are a “productivity adjustment factor” that results in across-the-board cuts to hospitals and other facilities in perpetuity; frozen income thresholds for new taxes that supposedly apply only to higher-income households; thresholds for a new “Cadillac” tax on high-cost insurance that rise more slowly than healthcare costs; and indexing rules for premium credits that will cause lower-income households to pay ever higher percentages of their income in premiums. As more taxpayers and beneficiaries come to understand the full implications of these provisions, pressure will build to make significant adjustments to them. The result could be much higher spending and lower revenue than originally forecast by the Congressional Budget Office.

Click here to view or download a full PDF of this paper by EPPC Senior Fellow James C. Capretta and Joseph R. Antos.


Most Read

EPPC BRIEFLY
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

SEARCH

Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

More in Health and Entitlement Reform

Related Publications

Yes, the 2017 Tax Cuts Helped Working-Class Americans. But Conservatives Should Be Honest About How.

Henry Olsen

A new analysis of Internal Revenue Service data is receiving a lot of attention among conservatives for showing that the 2017 tax cuts reduced the income tax burden of working-class taxpayers by a higher percentage than it did for higher-income earners. But conservatives should also recognize the main reason: expanded child tax credits that most supply-siders opposed.

Articles

The Washington Post / December 7, 2021

A Distinctly American Family Policy

Patrick T. Brown

Borrowing a family policy prescription from Helsinki or Budapest is bound to disappoint. A distinctly American family policy platform must be seen as expanding choice, not constraining it, and working with our national character, not trying to reshape it, all while understanding family as the essential institution in society, one that stakes an unavoidable claim on our public resources.

Articles

Public Discourse / November 11, 2021

5 Ways to Make America More Family-Friendly

Patrick T. Brown

The family is the fundamental unit of society, and has a claim on our resources. Here are five important steps policymakers could take to put that philosophy into practice.

Articles

National Catholic Register / November 10, 2021

INTERVIEW: Patrick T. Brown on Working-Class Families and the Child Tax Credit

Patrick T. Brown

EPPC Fellow Patrick T. Brown talks with Spotlight on Poverty about the congressional debate over child tax credits and what working-class families think about proposed federal aid.

Articles

Spotlight on Poverty / October 27, 2021