EEOC Says Title VII’s Religious-Organization Exemption Doesn’t Apply to Sex Discrimination Claims


Published December 10, 2024

National Review Online

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency tasked with preventing and remedying employment discrimination, recently filed an amicus brief in the Ninth Circuit, arguing that religious organizations cannot make hiring decisions based on religion.

The case, World Vision v. McMahon, involves the application of religious defenses to a sex discrimination claim.

The facts of the case are simple. Aubry McMahon applied for a job at World Vision, a “Christian ministry dedicated to sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ” through “humanitarian outreach to children and families around the world who are poor and underserved.” During the interview process, McMahon explicitly affirmed that she could comply with World Vision’s religious standards of conduct, including the ministry’s beliefs about traditional marriage. After World Vision offered her a job, McMahon disclosed that she was in a same-sex marriage. Because McMahon could not comply with the ministry’s religious standards of conduct, World Vision rescinded the job offer.

Click here to continue reading.


Rachel N. Morrison is a Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, where she directs EPPC’s Administrative State Accountability Project. An attorney, her legal and policy work focuses on religious liberty, health care rights of conscience, the right to life, nondiscrimination, and civil rights.

Most Read

EPPC BRIEFLY
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.

SEARCH

Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

More in Administrative State Accountability Project