CNBC Inadvertently Showcased the Republicans’ Best Qualities

Published on October 30, 2015

National Review Online

Jeb Bush’s campaign may be mortally wounded. Limping in the polls despite his massive war chest, he stooped (almost literally if you check the body language) to attacking Marco Rubio in an attempt to revive his fortunes.

Rubio’s response, suggesting that Bush had been “told” to attack him, seemed like a bull’s-eye. Jeb Bush is an honorable man; a man raised to behave like a gentleman; but he was feeling desperate at Wednesday’s debate, and tried to play against type. It failed utterly. Rubio was ready, and parried Bush’s thrust by highlighting — for Bush and the audience — how very unbecoming the attack was. He made Bush look small, and you could almost tell that Bush himself felt diminished for doing it. This was not the “joyful” race he had envisioned.

Is it really so shocking that Republican primary voters have turned their faces away from Jeb Bush? Though he was an outstanding governor of Florida, his election would represent something unprecedented in American politics — a third president from one family. It bespeaks a wholesome anti-dynastic spirit in the electorate to say, “No, two is the limit.” Those were certainly my sentiments. Nor did his donor base guarantee anything. Who was the best-financed Republican candidate in 1980? Not Reagan. Not even George H. W. Bush. It was John Connolly. He got exactly one delegate.

On the other hand, since we’re predicting his political demise, it’s worth saying for the record that the anti-Bush vitriol among some on the right has been needlessly hysterical. There is nothing hateful about Jeb Bush or the Bush family. If they have a sense of entitlement, well, there are far worse things — like, oh, flagrant corruption such as we find in the likely Democratic nominee.

Many on the right are completely convinced that the “Republican establishment” foists “moderate” nominees on an unwilling conservative electorate cycle after cycle. This is myth. Henry Olsen, my colleague at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, tracks election results with meticulous attention and observes that the reason moderates (Olsen actually calls them the “somewhat conservatives”) get nominated is this: They get more votes. Though I wish the party were more conservative, and God knows I wish the country were more conservative, the voters are in charge.

In addition to Marco Rubio, Chris Christie and Ted Cruz also had very good nights at the third debate. Carly Fiorina was strong and sensible, too.

I think all of the Republican debates should be hosted by CNBC from now on. The network demonstrated a number of traits people loathe about the press — and the candidates, most of them anyway, came out smelling like roses.

In the first place, by declining to use a stopwatch and a buzzer, CNBC (like CNN before it) guaranteed that the moderators would have to stomp on the candidates’ sentences in a bullying fashion. This provided an opening for Chris Christie to quip: “That’s rude even by New Jersey standards.” By providing so few rules and leaving so much to “moderator discretion,” CNBC invited the disorganized melee that sometimes broke out. This is an object lesson in letting liberals run things.

Second, by proffering “gotcha” questions, failing to provide sources (“Where did I read that?” asked Becky Quick at one point), and arguing with the candidates, the immoderate moderators revealed their bias.

Third, by posing questions about trivia like missed votes, who said what about whom (and please repeat it here so we can have a food fight and higher ratings), and fantasy-football betting, the questioners demonstrated that they are not up to the task of discussing the great challenges that face our nation.

The candidates, however, are. They sailed over the heads of the petty and niggling questions and managed to debate several serious points: 1) How to reform entitlements? 2) Is a flat tax feasible? 3) How can we generate economic growth? 4) What is the proper role of the federal government?

Well, not all of the candidates. The one candidate on the stage Wednesday night who had almost nothing of substance to say was the front-runner. History suggests that the voters will not choose him when the time comes. But here’s a question for the conspiracists: If the Republican “establishment” always picks moderates, wouldn’t that be Trump?

— Mona Charen is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. © 2015

Most Read

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.


Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today

Related Publications

Don’t Lose Sight of the Inflation Monster

Henry Olsen

August’s inflation report was heralded as a sign that rising prices are slowing down. If only that were true. People so want to believe that inflation is temporary that they will seize on any good news as a silver lining.


The Washington Post / September 23, 2021

Democrats’ Immigration Policies are a Gift to Republicans

Henry Olsen

The image of thousands of Haitian refugees huddling under a bridge in Del Rio, Tex., is forcing illegal immigration back into the national consciousness. That’s bad news for President Biden and his fellow Democrats, as this is a major political vulnerability for them.


The Washington Post / September 21, 2021

The World’s Populists Are Ascendant

Henry Olsen

Norway’s election on Monday begins a two-month collection of votes around the globe that will tell us a lot about public opinion a year-and-a-half into the pandemic. Though each country is different, the patterns are already clear: The traditional right is down, while the far left and populism are on the rise.


The Washington Post / September 15, 2021

The Virginia Governor’s Race Might Not Be a Slam Dunk for Democrat Terry McAuliffe

Henry Olsen

Virginia has become a Democratic-leaning state over the past decade, which gives former governor Terry McAuliffe a leg up in his effort to get his old job back. The polls, however, suggest that it might not be a slam dunk.


The Washington Post / September 7, 2021