100 Days Later

Published April 29, 2009

National Review Online

Now that we are 100 days into the new era of hope and change, NRO asked friends and contributors to evaluate the president’s performance. Joe Biden did promise that Barack Obama would be tested early in his presidency — how has he done so far?


A series of decisions by President Obama during his first 100 days indicates his plan is to govern from the left — at least for now.

He pushed the so-called stimulus bill through Congress on a largely partisan basis. His first budget submission is an unapologetic call for an activist domestic government — across the board. And he is working with Democratic leaders in Congress to pave the way for a health-care bill that can pass without any need to negotiate with congressional Republicans.

Perhaps the president and his political advisers have calculated that this governing game-plan gives them the best opportunity to secure their agenda while still leaving time to “move to the center” before a re-election effort gears up in earnest.

That may be, and it may work. But there are real risks, too.

It’s one thing to rely on just your partisan allies when the votes are easy, like more government funding for an array of programs in a “stimulus” bill. But it’s quite another when a president must ask his party colleagues to take tough stands knowing full well that it could expose them in the next election.

In the first 100 days of his administration, the president has been able to get by without asking for sacrifices from anyone. The targets have been the usual suspects for liberal Democrats: higher income households, insurers, drug companies, and banks.

But that’s not likely to last for long.

The test will come when Democrats are forced, by events and economic reality, to vote on measures that would impose costs on a broader cross-section of the electorate.

In health care, for instance, there are scores of minefields. A new mandate on employers to offer health insurance would reduce employment while the country remains in a deep recession. A requirement that citizens enroll in health insurance that is more expensive than their coverage today would feel like a tax increase to millions of people. Cuts in Medicare’s payment rates for optional private insurance would mean rolling back extra benefits for millions of enrollees.

Yes, the president and his allies have shown they can expand government over the opposition of Republicans. But can they impose discipline on their own too?

— James C. Capretta is fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a former associate director at the Office of Management and Budget.

Most Read

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up to receive EPPC's biweekly e-newsletter of selected publications, news, and events.


Your support impacts the debate on critical issues of public policy.

Donate today