Ethics and Public Policy Center
About EPPC Contact EPPC Support EPPC My EPPC
  Find:    
Home News & Updates Conferences & Events Programs Publications Fellows & Scholars
Publications
Publication Series
Blog Posting
Books
Center Conversations
Event Transcripts
Speeches
The Catholic Difference
The Gathering Storm
Browse by:
- Author
- Title
- Date
- Type


Please fill out the form below to receive our e-mail newsletter.

Your E-mail Address:
Your Name (Optional):
Submit
Home  >  Publications  > 
Porn's "Liberation" Still Looks Like Objectification
By Colleen Carroll Campbell
Posted: Saturday, March 8, 2008


ARTICLE
St. Louis Post-Dispatch  
Publication Date: March 6, 2008

Remember the anti-pornography feminist movement? Remember that powerhouse alliance of such feminist leaders as Gloria Steinem, Susan Brownmiller, Catharine MacKinnon and Andrea Dworkin that raged with righteous indignation throughout the 1970s and 1980s against an industry that objectifies women's bodies for profit?

It's understandable if you don't. The anti-pornography campaign catalyzed by the rhetoric of such feminist activists as Robin Morgan -- who famously proclaimed in 1974 that "Pornography is the theory and rape is the practice" -- has all but disappeared from public view today.

In its place has sprouted a very different feminist response to pornography, a growing trend toward women embracing pornography as a sign of sexual liberation and empowerment.

Signs of this shift abound -- from the popularity of women's pole-dancing classes to the explosion of female exhibitionism among reality TV contestants who compete for the chance to debase themselves before strangers. Porn stars who once were pitied and shunned now write bestselling memoirs gobbled up by women eager to emulate their seductive prowess. Pornographic images once hidden in the recesses of the magazine rack now clutter mainstream magazine covers, the broadcast airwaves and the e-mail in-boxes of women as well as men.

Pornography has gone mainstream. And it has done so with the tacit approval and often outright support of many American women, particularly young women.

A recent Brigham Young University study of more than 800 college students found that while young men are far more likely to view pornography -- nearly nine in 10 men report doing so, compared with about three in 10 women -- women increasingly are tolerant of it. Half of the young women surveyed said they consider pornography acceptable.

Driving this acceptance is an odd mix of feminism and fatalism. As vehemently as the waning ranks of anti-pornography feminists may deny it, the college women who tag along with male classmates to strip clubs and disrobe for "Girls Gone Wild" camera crews on spring break are the logical heirs to the 1960s sexual revolution that equated women's liberation with undisciplined sexuality. Confronted by a post-feminist culture that has reduced sex to a recreational sport and women's bodies to a commodity, these young women have decided that they might as well join the raunchy revelry and imitate boys behaving badly.

Journalist Ariel Levy chronicled this phenomenon in her 2005 book, Female Chauvinist Pigs. Noting the degrading antics of many young women in our porn-saturated culture and their oft-repeated desire to be seen as "one of the guys" as they objectify themselves and other women, Levy argued that women are internalizing and perpetuating the very misogyny against which early feminists rebelled.

Levy notes that young women often regard their celebration of our porn-saturated culture as an ironic joke. But it's a joke that earlier generations of American feminists and suffragettes probably would not have found funny. Their victories depended on refuting the age-old idea that women are the property and playthings of men, rather than persons in their own right.

That degrading view of women is alive and well in America's $13 billion-a-year pornography industry. Pornography peddles the same lies that always have been told about women: that women's bodies exist to be used and ogled by men, that male sexual satisfaction demands the subjugation of women, that a woman's worth boils down to the size and shape of her body parts.

Women living in 21st-century America like to believe that such lies are too passé to pose a real threat to our dignity. But the more we laugh at our own objectification, the more regret we will feel on the day we finally discover that the joke of pornography was on us all along.

-- Colleen Carroll Campbell is an author, television and radio host and St. Louis-based fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Her website is www.colleen-campbell.com.
Support EPPC's Work

The work of the Ethics and Public Policy Center is made possible by the generosity of our donors. Please consider supporting EPPC. 

Give the Gift of Ideas
Gift subscriptions to EPPC's journal 'The New Atlantis' now available

 

EPPC on Book TV
Weigel Featured on "In Depth"

On Sunday, June 1, EPPC Distinguished Senior Fellow George Weigel was featured on C-SPAN2/Book TV's program "In Depth."

Click here to view the program online.   


Religion and the Media
Michael Cromartie
Faith Angle Conference -- May 2008

EPPC Vice President Michael Cromartie moderated a series of discussions in May at the semi-annual Faith Angle Conference sponsored by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life and held in Key West, Florida. Transcripts of the informative talks are now available online.


 American Evangelicalism: New Leaders, New Faces, New Issues -- D. Michael Lindsay, author of Faith in the Halls of Power: How Evangelicals Joined the American Elite, describes eight fallacies or misconceptions he held as he began his book.

 Religious Voters in the 2008 Election: What It Means for Democrats, Republicans -- William A. Galston, a senior fellow at The Brookings Institution and an assistant for domestic policy in the Clinton administration, discusses the importance of the Catholic vote in 2008.

 How Our Brains are Wired for Belief -- What does brain science add to age-old debates about the existence of God and the value of religion? Can political parties and religious groups use scientific insights to influence the beliefs of others? Dr. Andrew Newberg and Mr. David Brooks raise these questions and share their insights with journalists.