|
|
Please fill out the form below to receive our e-mail newsletter.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| Published In |
 |
|
 |
| Spring 2003 |
| Issue 82 |
| Published: April 2003 |
 |
|
|
|
|
Islam Honor Bound
Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2003
"Global development has robbed many people in traditional societies of their concept of honor and dignity," and they have reacted by adopting "a perverted notion of honor," asserted Akbar S. Ahmed of American University at the March 10 Center seminar "Islam and the West: Living Dangerously in a Post-Honor World." While not unique to Muslim countries, this "ambiguous notion of honor" is pervasive among Muslims today—especially young, angry, illiterate, unemployed men "looking for a cause" in their disintegrating societies. Divorced from all constraints of chivalry, it exaggerates group loyalty, "propels men to violence" and vengeance, and has put Islam "on a collision course with the other world religions."
Ahmed pointed out that Muslim radicals may follow Islam’s injunctions regarding prayer and ritual, but they entirely ignore its stringent demands for basing social relations on the principles of "justice, compassion, and knowledge." The traditional Islamic aim of creating societies of "equilibrium" is now lost in the chaos and conflict arising from modernity. To find the way forward, he said, we must "begin the process of the dialogue of civilizations" by recognizing "that it is really the same God we’re talking about." America should also approach its Muslim community—potentially its "greatest asset in the war on terrorism"—with less suspicion, with careful respect shown to the Prophet Muhammad, and with a genuine desire to understand Islam.
Adding to Ahmed’s plea for religious understanding, Center visiting scholar James Bowman made a plea for understanding the Islamic world’s "language of honor," something that the Western world is "long out of the habit of using." He noted that in the wake of September 11, President Bush used the language of morality—"of good and evil"—rather than the language of honor. "It’s important to stress the difference between morality and honor," Bowman said. "Morality is universal; obligations of honor are to a particular society, not to the world in general, not to mankind." Whether Islamic society "will move in our direction" remains a big question, he said. The role of women is "very much bound up with the honor culture" and has not changed, particularly in the Arab world, as it has in the West.
Center president Hillel Fradkin moderated the exchange following the speakers’ remarks. Among those participating were Abdulwahab Alkebsi of the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy, Maryann Cusimano of Catholic University, Hali Jilani of the United Nations Association, Stanley Kurtz of the Hoover Institution, and writer Virendra Prakash.
|
|
|
|
 |
Support EPPC's Work

The work of the Ethics and Public Policy Center is made possible by the generosity of our donors. Please consider supporting EPPC.
|
|
|
| Religion and the Media |
 |
Faith Angle Conference -- May 2008
EPPC Vice President Michael Cromartie moderated a series of discussions in May at the semi-annual Faith Angle Conference sponsored by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life and held in Key West, Florida. Transcripts of the informative talks are now available online.
American Evangelicalism: New Leaders, New Faces, New Issues -- D. Michael Lindsay, author of Faith in the Halls of Power: How Evangelicals Joined the American Elite, describes eight fallacies or misconceptions he held as he began his book.
Religious Voters in the 2008 Election: What It Means for Democrats, Republicans -- William A. Galston, a senior fellow at The Brookings Institution and an assistant for domestic policy in the Clinton administration, discusses the importance of the Catholic vote in 2008.
How Our Brains are Wired for Belief -- What does brain science add to age-old debates about the existence of God and the value of religion? Can political parties and religious groups use scientific insights to influence the beliefs of others? Dr. Andrew Newberg and Mr. David Brooks raise these questions and share their insights with journalists.
|
|
|
|
 |