Ethics and Public Policy Center
About EPPC Contact EPPC Support EPPC My EPPC
  Find:    
Home News & Updates Conferences & Events Programs Publications Fellows & Scholars
Conferences & Events
Past Events
Conference Series
Browse by:
- Title
- Date


Please fill out the form below to receive our e-mail newsletter.

Your E-mail Address:
Your Name (Optional):
Submit
EPPC Programs
Bioethics and American Democracy
Catholic Studies
The Constitution, the Courts, and the Culture
Economics and Ethics
Evangelicals in Civic Life
Foreign Policy
Islam and American Democracy
Jewish Studies
Program to Protect America's Freedom
Religion and the Media
Science, Technology, and Society
South Asian Studies and Religious Nationalism
Home  >  Conferences & Events  > 
Related Materials
Published transcript
Hindu Nationalism vs. Islamic Jihad
Religious Militancy in India and Pakistan
Start:  Monday, June 10, 2002
End:  Monday, June 10, 2002

At the heart of the deepening conflict between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan is religious militancy. Islamic militant groups, which Pakistan either continues to support or refuses to restrain, attacked India's Parliament in December and an Islamabad church in March and, less than three weeks ago, killed 30 people (mostly women and children) in a terrorist assault in Kashmir. Typically overloooked, however, is the fact that India's growing Hindu militancy--which enjoys close ties with the Indian government--is stoking Hindu-Muslim conflict in the regio and undermining India's secular democracy. Unwittingly, Hindu militancy may also further radicalize South Asian Islam.

While India's democratic constitution is based on religious impartiality, right-wing Hinduism has grown increasingly powerful since the 1990s. With a Hindu-nationalist political party now dominating India's governing coalition, right-wing Hinduism enjoys immense political support. And the threat of Islamic militancy has only enhanced its popularity. The movement includes militant organizations that--in retaliation for a deadly attack by Muslims on a trainload of Hindus--helped organize the systematic killing of as many as 2,000 Muslims in the western state of Gujarat in March. Gujarat's right-wing Hindu government demonstrably--and perhaps deliberately--failed to restrain the perpetrators. Even as the killings continued, India's central government pledged its wholehearted support for the Hindu-nationalist agenda.

What dangers do religious militancy in general and Hindu militancy in particular pose to India's fragile democracy and the region's even more fragile stability? Will unchecked Hindu extremism drive India's largely moderate Muslim population of 120 million into an extremist reaction? To contain Hindu militancy and the violence it inspires, what steps must India take? What constructive role, if any, can be played by US policy toward the region?

As a result of this conference and the powerful messages of the speakers, Congressman Joseph Pitts (R.-Pa.) made this speech before the House of Representatives on June 18, 2002:

"Mr. Speaker, I rise today to condemn the atrocities committed by Hindu extremists in Gujurat, India, against Muslims and other minority groups. Last week I met with human rights, academic and religious leaders from India who shared reports documenting the designs of the extremist groups against Muslims, Christians, Dalits and others.

Trained combatants in Gujarat entered villages and attacked men, women and children. Pregnant women had their wombs ripped open and unborn baies were ripped out and tossed into burning fires. Approximately 300 women were gang raped. Over 2,000 people died. I have photos too gruesome to show in my office.

It appears that some of these Hindu extremist groups receive some of their funds from charities in the U.S. and the U.K. We should ensure that no funds from the United States gathered under charitable causes are used to finance terrorism, and we must publicly condemn the violence and officials who support ethnic cleansing.

Mr. Speaker, our government must respond to these brutal attacks and the underlying extremism. The silence of the U.S. Government is deafening."

Speakers

Cedric Prakash is Jesuit priest, based in Gujarat, where he serves as state coordinator of the United Christian Forum on Human Rights. Fr. Prakash closely follows religious extremism in South Asia.

Jonah Blank is a senior foreign policy advisory for Senator Joseph Biden, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, a longtime student of religion and politics in India.

Kamal Chenoy is Professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi and a noted expert on religious militancy and religious violence in India.

Sumit Ganguly is Professor of Asian Studies and Government at the University of Texas-Austin. He is a noted authority on politicas and security issues in the subcontinent and author of Crisis Unending: Indo-Pakistan Tensions Since 1947 (Columbia University Press, 2002).

Sunil Khilnani is Professor of Politics at the University of London and currently a Fellows of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington. He is the author of The Idea of India (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1999) and is currently completing a biography of Jawaharlal Nehru.

Teesta Setalvad is Human Rights activitst based in India. She co-authored a 150-page report on the recent violence in Gujarat, entitled "Genocide," published in India in April.



Give the Gift of Ideas
Gift subscriptions to EPPC's journal 'The New Atlantis' now available

 

Technology and Society
The Age of Neuroelectronics

For decades, experiments at the border between brains and electronics have led to sensationalistic media coverage, vivid science fiction portrayals, and dreams of cyborgs and bionic men. But recently, this area of science has seen remarkable advances -- from robotic limbs controlled directly by brain activity, to brain implants that alter the mood of the depressed, to rats steered by remote control. In this New Atlantis article, EPPC Fellow Adam Keiper explores the peculiar history and present directions of this research, and considers the challenges of staying human in the age of neuroelectronics. 

M. Edward Whelan III
Blogging on the Courts

EPPC President Edward Whelan, the director of the program on The Constitution, the Courts, and the Culture, is a leading contributor to Bench Memos, National Review Online's award-winning blog on judicial nominations and constitutional law. You can read a list of all of his postings here.

Here is some of the praise Mr. Whelan has received for his blogging:

From Steve Schmidt, who, as special adviser to President Bush, led the White House's efforts to confirm the Supreme Court nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito: "Ed Whelan was the most influential and valuable commentator on the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito. His remarkably rapid, thorough, and reliable responses to the distorted attacks on the nominees prevented those attacks from gaining traction. The White House was deeply grateful that he was on our side."

From Paul Mirengoff of the influential Power Line blog:  "Blogs like NRO’s Bench Memos … enable legal super-stars like Ed Whelan to shoot down bad arguments against nominees within hours." 


"Cube and Cathedral" Now in Paperback

Senior Fellow George Weigel's 2005 book The Cube and the Cathedral -- a Foreign Affairs bestseller -- is now available in the United States in paperback, and has been published in several foreign-language editions: Polish, Italian, and French. For more information, or to purchase copies, click here